| From the Editor |
 |
|
Welcome to the first 2006 issue of our newsletter. This
month we have some thoughts on marriage as a form of mutual
disturbance – and is it all right to deliberately disturb your
partner in the interest of that person’s growth? We also have
observations on the virtues of humility, occasioned by my poor
performance in Spanish class.
We include an article of mine, new to the site, on
imbalance in communication and ways of correcting it and a
Relationship Tip, also with suggestions on the importance of
taking care of yourself, even in the best of relationships.
In the future, we will hopefully include readers’ comments
and experiences. You can help that cause by writing us, in
response to the questions and issues raised in this issue, at
newsletter
@marriagesupport.com.
If you like "Living Together" and find it useful, please
tell others about our e-zine. They can sign up for a free
subscription here.
|
| Correcting Communication
Imbalance |
 |
|
One Always Speaks, the Other Always Listens In
the most familiar of all patterns of couple communication
imbalance, one partner does nearly all the talking and the
other nearly all the listening. Few couples like this pattern.
Even those for whom this has been “the way we are” for a
long time, resent the pattern. The one who does all the
speaking doesn’t acquire skills in listening. Because the
“always listening” partner tuned out long ago, the “always
talking” partner usually feels unappreciated.
Correspondingly, the “always listening” partner suffers
from atrophied speaking skills, if not in other relationships,
certainly in this one. As the non-talker, he is also typically
the non- asserter, having surrendered his desires and points
of view, along with his right to speak.
Both are lonely in the relationship, because fundamentally
they don’t connect.
This familiar pattern of one-way speech often begins with a
misunderstanding. Assuming that the silent partner is the
husband, originally he said nothing when she stopped talking,
because he thought that she wasn’t really finished speaking.
Actually, she was finished. However, when he didn’t
respond, she resumed. She interpreted his silence to mean that
he didn’t understand her. So she delivered the same message a
second time. Then, when he was still silent, she tried a third
time, elaborating and adding examples. He remained silent,
thinking, “I guess she still needs to talk.”
He never said, “Are you finished now?” She never asked,
“Are you silent because you don’t understand what I am
saying?” Before long, what began as a misunderstanding became
a habit: She did more and more of the talking, until basically
she was doing it all. He waited silently for her to finish and
then returned to whatever he had been doing before she started
her monologue.
Quite likely she was naturally more the extroverted talker
and he more the introverted listener. But because they didn’t
talk, what could have been a minor difference of personality
became instead two people unhappily bound in their respective
roles: The more she talked, the less he said anything. And the
silenter he became, the more she filled the strained silence
with her own words.
Typically, he did speak up at some point – perhaps on
something that he felt urgent about. But her resentment had
become so great that probably she cut him off or took the
conversational ball quickly away from him. Her behavior
confirmed the view that, by this time, he had developed: There
was no sense in trying to talk to her. She was a better talker
than he and would always win.
Clearly, this couple needs to have a “meta conversation” -
a conversation about their lack of conversation. Such a
conversation is only possible if both partners approach it in
a nonjudgmental manner – avoiding argument, and going instead
for open sharing.
Most couples can benefit from talking together about their
communcation. Consider such a conversation with your partner.
Suggestions:
- Ask each other: Fundamentally, how do you feel about the
way we communicate with each other? Afterward ask, when is
it good? When is it not good? At the end ask, Did you feel
safe having this conversation?
- If your relationship suffers from a “talking/listening
imbalance,” follow this approach: The silent partner comes
up with an interest or concern that he is willing to talk
about to the other person. They agree that basically he will
talk and she will listen. In preparation, he gets his
thoughts in order, and she assumes the “interested and
receptive” stance of good listening.
- In the future, when either one brings up an important
topic for discussion, they delay the discussion for a day,
during which each person gets together the points that she
or he wants to make. They take turns being the one to open
the discussion.
- Try practicing the “she said/he said” rhythm of
conversational speech. Sit opposite each other. The speaker
holds a pillow and tosses it to the listener when he or she
is finished. The listener must then speak and toss the
pillow back. The pillow in motion is used to teach the
rhythm of regularly alternating speech.
Copyright © 2006 Dr. David Sanford/Promising Partnerships,
Inc. All rights reserved.
For permission to quote from or duplicate this article,
please write permission@marriagesupport.com.
Do you want to read further? See the marriagesupport.com
article collection on Communication
Problems.
|
| Relationship Tip - Care for
Yourself |
 |
|
Take Good Care of Yourself in Marriage
“I have to take care of myself in this marriage.” The
statement suggests a hostile relationship, in which if I don’t
take care of myself, my partner is going to abuse me or take
advantage of me.
Yes, clearly there are relationships in which you do have
to take care of yourself in the sense suggested. However, the
advice to take care of yourself applies equally well to
healthy relationships. Here is how.
In a healthy relationship, “taking good care of yourself”
often means setting limits to the demands of others so that
you have sufficient time and space to know what your own needs
actually are (“time for myself,” “space for myself.”)
It means finding meaning for yourself outside the
relationship – like friends and activities you enjoy. It means
refusing to dump on yourself for mistakes or inadequacies and
instead being your own “friendly witness” to your positive
qualities and the good things that you do.
Okay, it’s important to take good care of yourself in a
marriage or any couple relationship – but how much? Enough so
that you don’t find yourself depending on your partner to
provide you with what you ought to be providing yourself but
either refuse to do so or can’t.
That’s the “don’t ask someone to do for you what you should
be doing for yourself” answer. It is good advice, but it
doesn’t help us distinguish between what caring partners ought
to be doing for each other and what is the responsibility of
each to do for himself or herself.
I think it comes down to this: In the areas of meaning,
affection, interest and value, we are fundamentally
responsible for our own needs. All of our needs? No. If we
were able to meet all of them, we would be independent – even
of the need for a partner.
We need to be responsible for our own needs to balance the
tendency of most of us to assume, in a committed relationship,
that our partner will take care of our needs. If we marry with
that assumption, we may well also find that our spouse has the
same assumption as ours. With two needy people, who will do
the giving?
You burden a relationship with your needs when, rightly or
wrongly, you ask more of your partner than your partner is
able or willing to give. Your partner may start out willing,
but if what she or he gives you is not enough and you find
fault, you influence your partner to give less, not more. Such
is not your intention, but it almost always works that way.
Healthy relationships of equals are not based on need but
on mutual interest and appreciation. There is a lot of room in
such a relationship for interdependence - two people out of
love to look out for each other’s well being.
I’ve got to look out for myself in our relationship, not
because you make me but because, with you doing the same, that
is the way to keep us healthy.
Activity
- Do you think that your partner feels burdened by needs
of yours that your partner thinks you should be meeting
yourself? List your assumptions. Then share them with your
partner. Find out of you are right.
- Do you think that your partner wishes that you brought
more of your needs to the relationship – that you are in
fact too independent, in your partner’s view? Find out of
you are right. List your assumptions. Then share them with
your partner.
- In what areas of your life do you know that you need to
take better care of yourself? What have been the
consequences for your relationship of your under-caring for
yourself in these areas?
|
|
|
Observations |
|
|
|
Marriage is a kind of mutual disturbance. People
living together are bound to disturb each other with their
differences – musical tastes, values, political outlook,
personal habits, etc., etc.
What do you do? You try to convince your partner to be more
like yourself, until – hopefully – you realize one day that
that approach is never going to work. Then you learn to
compromise: We live somewhat your way and somewhat mine.
That is what you might call natural disturbance.
Do you think that there are occasions when it is all right
to disturb your partner deliberately? For example, is it okay
to lean on your partner if you believe that your religious
views are right and your partner’s are flat out wrong?
How about if, in your view, your partner is endangering his
or her health – smokes, drinks too much, is way overweight,
never exercises? Is it okay to lean on your partner to change
that sort of behavior? If you say yes, well how far do you
push it? Where do you stop?
Many people believe that we get married because of our
differences. You marry someone partly because that person has
strengths that you need. The idea is, through the influence of
your partner, to acquire some of the strengths your partner
has and, thus, become a better person.
So if it seems to you that your partner married you in part
to become (say) a more assertive person – like you are -
wouldn’t it be okay for you to disturb your partner – push
your partner to be more assertive – maybe by deliberately
giving him or her a hard time? Would that be okay? Where do
you draw the line?
SHARE YOUR OPINION. Write us at newsletter
@marriagesupport.com.We want to know what you think.
The benefits of humility If you have spent any
time on marriagesupport.com, you may have noticed there
descriptions of the Couples Vacation Intensives program I’ve
designed for our new center in San
Miguel de Allende Mexico.
Well I’m writing this issue of the newsletter from San
Miguel. I’m there – or rather here – right now, working on the
site and doing client sessions over the telephone.
I am also taking a month’s intensive Spanish course –
mostly grammar and vocabulary, unfortunately. For me the class
has been one long lesson in humility. I feel like I am back in
seventh grade – the dumb kid who gets called on and can’t do
the recitation. Learning Spanish humbles me.
I have been thinking about humility – and have come to see
it as not necessarily a bad thing. Here are some examples that
come to mind – being humbled by the realization that you
really do need your wife, maybe by an illness in which you
were dependent on your wife and she cared for you.
Another one might be being humbled by the realization that
your partner is a good deal more generous than you are. Maybe
you messed something up badly. Your partner bailed you out
without complaint and never made you pay for screwing up.
I think being humbled by your partner’s generosity, skill
or character is fine.
What do you think? If you agree, how about being on the
lookout for opportunities – provided by your partner’s love,
kindness, generosity, resourcefulness or strength – to look up
to that person. Find those ways in which your partner does
stand above you, and be grateful for their example in your
life.
|
|